DSpace Repository

A polihisztor viselkedéshagyomány erdélyi magyar tudósok körében

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editor Kovács Kiss, Gyöngy hu_HU
dc.contributor.editor Egyed, Emese hu_HU
dc.contributor.editor Ilyés, Szilárd-Zoltán hu_HU
dc.contributor.editor Kerekes, György hu_HU
dc.contributor.editor Kovács, András hu_HU
dc.contributor.editor Szász, Alpár Zoltán hu_HU
dc.contributor.editor Tánczos, Vilmos hu_HU
dc.contributor.editor Veress, Károly hu_HU
dc.coverage.spatial Kolozsvár hu_HU
dc.coverage.spatial Erdély hu_HU
dc.creator Berki, Tímea hu_HU
dc.date.accessioned 2013-01-23T09:09:47Z
dc.date.available 2013-01-23T09:09:47Z
dc.date.created 2007 hu_HU
dc.date.issued 2007 hu_HU
dc.identifier.isbn article hu_HU
dc.identifier.issn 1453-0961 hu_HU
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10598/25849
dc.description I. Nyelv, Olvasás, Filozófia hu_HU
dc.description.abstract Sámuel Brassai was called the last Transylvanian polyhistor in Imre Mikó's book. We also know about publications that use this same term for Brassai's disciple, namely Ottó Herman who was much younger than his master and whose scholarly activities extend even to the 20th century. Sámuel Brassai, mentioned as Nestor of sciences was a peculiar figure of his century's academic life. His all-embracing works were difficult to understand in the 1860s, and they are still hard to comprehend, since he had published his discoveries, opinion, professional findings and objections in several disciplines and languages. Exactly the disciples segregated and the professional identities differentiated in the course of the 19th century have made more difficult the treatment of the oeuvre that had been still founded upon the earlier notion of the scholar and had left the specialization out of consideration. However, this is due to the successful meeting of the scholarly personality and Brassai's figure and socialization. His scholarly attitude didn't hurt any disciples studied by him, but he has become strange, incomprehensible with time and on the other hand reason of cultic attitude due to the high standard of his knowledge and his efficiency. His socialization, bringing-up and confession can be standpoints of research, since all these are components of his becoming a scholar. This presentation on one hand traces this becoming through Brassai's published writings, and on the other hand works on those sources of book history, institutional history and cultural history by which we can build up the system of both the meanings of Brassai's status as polyhistor and the survival of this scholarly attitude in the 19th century. hu_HU
dc.description.tableofcontents 36-47 old. hu_HU
dc.format PDF hu_HU
dc.language.iso Hun hu_HU
dc.language.iso Eng hu_HU
dc.publisher Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület hu_HU
dc.relation.ispartofseries Erdélyi Múzeum LXIX, 2007. 3-4. füzet hu_HU
dc.rights Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület hu_HU
dc.source Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület hu_HU
dc.subject polihisztor hu_HU
dc.subject Brassai Sámuel (1797–1897) hu_HU
dc.subject életrajz hu_HU
dc.subject oktatás hu_HU
dc.subject tudós hu_HU
dc.subject munkásság hu_HU
dc.subject énkép hu_HU
dc.title A polihisztor viselkedéshagyomány erdélyi magyar tudósok körében hu_HU
dc.title.alternative The Attitudinal Tradition of the Polyhistor Among Scholars from Transylvania hu_HU
dc.type Article hu_HU
dcterms.provenance Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület hu_HU
europeana.provider Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület hu_HU
europeana.unstored Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület hu_HU
europeana.type TEXT hu_HU
dcterms.medium paper hu_HU

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


My Account